The Debate On Euthanasia Is Never Ending - 1263 Words

The debate on euthanasia is never ending. It is an important topic that debates whether assisted death is ethical or In spite of this euthanasia is not discriminatory towards the mentally ill. They are reasons and law Euthanasia is ‘painless inducement of a quick death’. It is is a long living debate that challenges the morality of life. Due to its high controversy only certain countries have legalised the procedure however they have strict rules and procedures that must be followed. In spite of these rigid laws it has been criticised for being biased, ignoring those who suffer from mental illness as eligible for euthanasia. This will be elaborated further throughout the report There are different types of Euthanasia, it varies†¦show more content†¦In 1997 Oregon became the first state in the United States to decriminalize physician-assisted suicide; opponents of the controversial law, however, attempted to have it overturned. In 2009 the Supreme Court of South Korea recognized a â€Å"right to die with dignity†in its decision to approve a request by the family of a brain-dead woman that she be removed from life-support systems. These law for euthanasia however have different restriction depending on the country or state that declared it. For example: In the Netherlands ‘Only a doctor may legally perform euthanasia. In principle this should be a doctor who has an established treatment-relationship with the patient’’. However in Oregon, the law states that physicians can only prescribe a lethal dose to a terminally ill patient. Not actually committing the action. These differences show that euthanasia is slowly getting accepted in the 21st century however strict boundaries are still built to avoid further controversy. These laws consist of strict criterions for euthanasia, For example, The law in the Netherlands’ states: â€Å"The patient s suffering must be unbearable and hopeless (in the sense of without hope for improvement This requirement is further operationalized as follows: the suffering need not be physical (pain etc.) nor is a somatic basis required; non-physical suffering can include such things